Cardano & Ethereum Smart Contracts

Smart contracts have a high demand amid the extents of remote and outsourced work in the world. Workers ranging from CEOs to freelancers have uses and potential demands for them. Writing them to quality standard can be challenging for multiple reasons, and different types have been created in attempt to better address different potentials within different areas of current industry.

Business demands for smart contracts have extended many technology applications, innovative products and services, and changing business needs spanning multiple regional legislation and other areas that demand high flexibility and consideration of a great deal of content. Cardano and Ethereum have been popular types amid the combination of changes and demands in applicable areas, and are expected to remain popular across the next decade. Continuing research and development is expected to involve mutual competition spanning a range of features improving in the near future.

Cardano and Ethereum are both decentralized cryptocurrencies, with Cardano currently regarded to be the more decentralized of the two, and with Ethereum regarded as having the capacity to surpass it. Both databases are considered to have survival potential analogous to Bitcoin in terms of their being industrially popular within the next five to 10 years of market evolution, both being considered to have remaining capacities in aiding the power of current financial processes and structures. Both types have blockchains that are compatible with smart contracts, and both have been increasingly used while recommended for further specific developments as demands for still greater use increase.

Specific developments within the current year are expected to involve expansion and improvements of existing smart contract features, and the fact that the individual involved with the founding and direction of Cardano is also involved with Ethereum has implied that continuing developments in both products will involve some shared information and expanded capacities. This is Charles Hoskinson, a math and cryptocurrency expert who had helped develop Ethereum with four others while having also been involved in the development of Cardano. Developments in Cardano have been geared towards optimal scalability and high energy efficiency as a platform for smart contracts, while developments in Ethereum have been geared towards blockchain decentralization and security optimization. Ethereum has also been more tailored towards private sector use and use in the developed world, while Cardano has been more tailored for adoption within the governments and public sectors of developing countries. The two have also been different in terms of their developmental approach, with Ethereum using a traditional hands-on method that prioritizes practice over theory, while Cardano has sought optimal peer-review and academic testing before implementing elements for use.

Following its initial launch in 2015, Ethereum has become second place in the competitive cryptocurrency market (following Bitcoin), hosting what has been measured as the greatest range of elements within cryptocurrency spanning NFTs, altcoins, dApps, and stable coins among other components. Cardano was launched approximately two years afterward, and is expected to integrate more smart contract components with time. It has recently been observed to be sixth place within the current market (see figure below).


(see below for source listings)

The superiority of Ethereum over Cardano has involved growth levels that are exponential, addressing preferences for transaction elements and decentralized nature. It continues to address changing consumer demands as Cardano has been less successful in addressing the full range of demands while providing comparably or superior service aspects in its offerings. Cardano’s current system has included two levels, using a settlement layer for recording ADA and native assets, and a computation layer for the smart contract aspects still being developed. It has been able to exceed the successes of other competitors in the marketplace in processing several hundred transactions per second while using a proof-of-stake consensus element. The extent of processing has been projected to reach up to 2.5 million per second from an implementation of a hydra-scaling component. Recent assessments of Cardano’s market value amid participation and staking rewards has seemed to confirm its potential to rise in value beyond its current level to levels nearer the current success of Ethereum.


(see below for source listings)

Meanwhile, Ethereum has been using ERC-20 tokens and a shard chain architecture while being developed towards a second version that is an overhaul of the first. It has also used proof-of-stake technology as a consensus component. Transactions are processed and stored in relation to user wallets for optimal relevance while in parallel and connected to the Beacon. The Beacon is used to coordinate staking while processing approximately 100,000 transactions per second. An ERC-20 converter allows tokens to be transferred to Cardano, which is currently the closest element of connectivity between both system types. The second version has involved an extension of the name, planned to be referred to as Ethereum 2.0. 

Developmental progress has encompassed transaction processing and aspects of token features in addition to smart contract components. Ethereum has been functioning with validation forcing that facilitates greater hardware purchasing and transaction processing, and further expands extent of decentralization beyond other current proof-of-stake based blockchains. Demand for Cardano has been increasing the US, while expansion potential of Ethereum has also been great, including the European Investment Bank’s issuance of bonds to facilitate greater integration within public sectors. At the same time, Ethereum may lose some popularity from the gas fees required for transaction validations, along with an extent of scalability commonly complained about, potentially leaving room for competition to successfully target an affected market share.

Current advantages and potentials will be considered in ongoing developmental direction. Cardano does not need execution costs for smart contract use, and its ledger is supportive of native tokens, which may be followed by developments even in the more successful services. Its integral accounting model may also be copied or closely followed by others. Ledgers being used to track and transfer different asset types is another area potentially used as a model for other services. Transferring tokens on Ethereum currently demands direct changing of contract type, and this is expected to be followed by similar developments in Cardano. Similar methods of further minimizing error risks and vulnerability are expected to be comparably prioritized in continuing developments.

Research and development is also expected to include integrations with new and more types of tokens. Existing business processes have typically involved managers operating in custodial roles in using tokens, and both Etherium and Cardano have been seeking to expand compatibility with existing and emerging organizations as smart contract features continue to evolve. These developments are expected to better facilitate communications across different business chains, catalyzing competition and progressive developments that result. 

Upgrading to proof of stake has been claimed to be something a company with a lot of money may be unwise to rush to do, and has been related to the case of Cardano in its focus on energy efficiency. Ethereum, meanwhile, has become an industrial leader through its focuses on blockchain demands in consumers as well as technological potentials that are both efficient and effective in terms of demands and potential. The extent of its popularity with different types of investors has led to some focused developmental capacities in specific areas in their general approach towards optimization, and this may lead to technological integrations that occur within Ethereum or even Cardano before they manifest in Bitcoin or any replacement.  

The smart contract developments undertaken in the second quarter of this year should increase Cardano’s popularity and demand. The organization has expressed business objectives of providing secure, scalable, and efficient blockchain service, and expansions such as smart contract features cater to investor demands. Its focus on environmental sustainability has a corporate social responsibility or reputation element which implies it will continue to address aspects regarded as ethical while having such a unique angle in relation to aspects of consumer demands. The current developments in this area in terms of technology are its use of proof-of-stake consensus versus proof-of-work systems, with the latter known to be more energy consuming. Both Bitcoin and Ethereum currently use the more energy-intensive system, and the extent that this caters to demands and use as an ethical element for the environmentally conscious can potentially be measured for further responsibility considerations or direct applications of strategy.

Cardano’s current functioning with two layers, a settlement layer and a computing layer, helps it to process a large amount of transactions without the extent of mining that is required in proof-of-stake processes. Meanwhile, its use of native tokens provides some potential advantage over other systems to users amid their interactivity and distribution potentials. The future of development in both Cardano and Ethereum are expected to involve changes and expansions in these areas amid competition with Bitcoin and new market entrants, with the variables present in emerging technologies naturally guiding aspects of changes and consumer demand.

Regarding smart contract dynamics in all of this demand, the second half of the year will allow use and analysis of the compatibility between Ethereum and Cardano in smart contract use. Developers will be able to develop Cardano projects using Solidity programming, which may increase use and support amid the extent of current familiarity. It also plans to implement a system of governing that is controlled by the community, and automatic treasury systems to power continuing network development aspects, which is expected to affect competition and aspects of demand for program developments.

There is expected to be continuing focus on optimizing alternatives to the traditional processes of banking, and changing costs of aspects of technology such as hosting are predicted to have more bearing on the future of development than is traditionally thought. Cardano’s support of Plutus smart contracts and Alonzo hard fork are turning points for the near term, while the support of Ethereum tokens are expected to assist users in making the most of the lower fees and general cost, greater extent of security, and expanded capacity to host transactions in the Cardano system.

Beyond the above, developments through the near future are expected to be focused on transaction units, payment units, accessibility to other digital services, reward and incentive systems, right to vote, investing systems, and new user demands related to tokens and other aspects. 


Bringing ERC20 to Cardano – IOHK Blog

What is Cardano? | Coinbase

Ethereum (ETH) vs. Cardano (ADA): Which Is Best? Best Smart Contract Blockchains | Coinmonks (

Filed in: Uncategorized